IM National policies comparison


Nature of reaction to a stimulus
NATO scale
 
Combustion without lethal projection
Type V
Increasing
Fast combustion
Type IV
attenuation
Increasing
Explosion
Type III
Violence
Partial detonation
Type II
of the
Detonation
TYPE I
reaction

 

TYPE OF STIMULUS
ULTIMATE/IDEAL ATTENUATION OBJECTIVES
TESTING METHOD TO BE USED
Fire
V
Stanag 4240
Slow cookof
V
Stanag 4382
Bullet impact
V
Stanag 4241
Sympathetic detonation
III
Stanag 4396
Light fragment impact
V
National testing
Heavy fragment impact
V
"
Shaped charge jet
III
"
Spall
V
"


Attenuation aims specified by Stanag 4439

IMness levels

Maximal accepted response levels

STIMULI
FRANCE
NATO
UK
USA
French DOD MURAT policy
DGA/IPE 260 memorandum (july 93)
STANAG
4439
(2)
OBP
42657
MIL-STD
2105 B
*
**
***
RAPID HEATING
IV(1)
V
V
V
V
V
SLOW HEATING
III
V
V
V
V
V
BULLET IMPACT
III
III
V
V
V
V
SYMPATHETIC REACTION
III
III
IV
III
III
II
LIGHT FRAGMENT IMPACT
I
III
V
V
   
HEAVY FRAGMENT IMPACT
I
III
IV
V
   
SHAPED CHARGE JET
I
I
III
III
V
II
SPALL AFTER SCJ      
V
V
V
DROP
NR
NR
NR
 
NR
NR
ELECTRIC STIMULI
NR
NR
NR
     

(1) without propulsion

(2) STANAG 4439 = ideal goals



date : sept 1st 1999